Comparison of DIA and DDA in Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics

Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics, as an important tool for studying the dynamic changes in protein expression in biological systems, has been widely used in disease mechanism research, drug target discovery, and biomarker screening. In label-free quantitative strategies,Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA) and Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA)are the two most common methods for mass spectrometry data acquisition, each with different technical characteristics and application scenarios. This article will systematically compare these two strategies to help researchers make optimal choices in experimental design.

 

1. What is DDA (Data-Dependent Acquisition)?

🔹 Brief Introduction

DDA is a data acquisition method that prioritizes strong signals over weak ones. In a single MS scan, the mass spectrometer first performs an MS1 full scan, then selects the top N strongest precursor ions for MS2 fragmentation analysis based on signal intensity. This method ensures high-quality MS/MS spectra, suitable forprotein identification.。

 

🔹 Advantages

• High spectrum quality: The strongest signals are fragmented each time, resulting in a good signal-to-noise ratio, facilitating high-confidence identification.

• High database search efficiency: The obtained MS/MS information is suitable for traditional search algorithms like SEQUEST and Mascot.

 

🔹 Limitations

• Poor reproducibility: Different samples or batches may select different precursor ions, leading to many missing values.

• Unfriendly to low-abundance proteins: High-abundance proteins are more likely to be selected, often overlooking low-abundance proteins.

• Limited dynamic range: In complex samples, the 'masking' effect of high-abundance proteins is significant.

 

2. What is DIA (Data-Independent Acquisition)?

🔹 Brief Introduction

DIA adopts a 'non-discriminatory scanning' strategy, fragmenting all ions within preset m/z windows, independent of precursor ion intensity. Representative technologies include SWATH-MS and diaPASEF. DIA capturessystematic full-spectrum informationsuitable forquantitative analysis.。

 

🔹 Advantages

• High reproducibility and data completeness: Consistent ion selection across samples, significantly reducing missing values.

• More friendly to low-abundance proteins: Full-spectrum acquisition avoids bias towards high-abundance proteins.

• Facilitates the construction of reproducible spectral libraries.

 

🔹 Limitations

• High data complexity: Significant overlap in MS2 spectra, requiring advanced software for deconvolution.

• High dependency on algorithms: Data analysis requires specialized DIA software like Spectronaut, DIA-NN, EncyclopeDIA, etc.

 

3. Core Performance Comparison between DIA and DDA

  

Item	DDA	DIA
Data Acquisition Method	Selective Fragmentation (TopN)	Full Window Fragmentation (All Ions)
Spectrum Quality	High (but random)	Medium (requires deconvolution)
Missing Values	Many, poor reproducibility	Few, good cross-sample consistency
Friendliness to Low-Abundance Proteins	Poor	Good
Data Analysis Complexity	Medium	High
Software Tools	Mascot、MaxQuant	DIA-NN、Spectronaut
Applicable Scenarios	Protein Identification	High-Throughput Quantification

 

4. Recommendations for Application Scenarios

1. Exploratory Research/New Species Research

If the research goal is to discover unknown proteins and construct protein maps, DDA is the preferred method due to its high spectral quality and efficient database matching.

 

2. Large-scale sample quantification/clinical cohort analysis

In large sample cohort analyses and high-throughput quantitative studies such as disease biomarker screening, DIA is more suitable for differential protein screening and statistical analysis due to its high data consistency and fewer missing values.

 

3. Mass spectrometry library construction strategy

A common approach is to first use DDA to build a high-quality spectral library and then perform DIA quantification. This“DDA+DIA combined strategy”balances data quality and throughput and has become one of the mainstream solutions.

 

Both DDA and DIA have unique advantages. Researchers should make scientific choices based on experimental aims, sample types, and budget. As the next generation mainstream trend, DIA's advantages in quantitative proteomics are becoming increasingly prominent. Meanwhile, DDA remains indispensable for library construction and new protein discovery. Biotech Pack focuses on providing high-quality Label-Free quantitative proteomics analysis services, widely applicable to basic research, disease mechanism studies, biomarker screening, and clinical translation.

 

Biotech Pack – A premium service provider for bioproduct characterization and multi-omics mass spectrometry detection

 

Related services:

Label-Free quantitative proteomics analysis